Restructuring or reorganising a company costs money. But it is precisely when a company is faced with such a situation that liquidity is a scarce commodity. So during this phase, the company’s financing providers are particularly important and needed. There is one key point here: Funding providers have to be convinced of both the effectiveness and feasibility of the necessary reorganisation measures. They normally also require security interests or “trust-building measures” in return for any reorganisation funding they provide.
This is where the dual-purpose trust, also known as a bilateral (security) trust, comes into play. Here a trustee, acting as a neutral third party, receives certain assets – the security collateral or trust property – from a trustor to serve as security for the financing providers or beneficiaries. The assets concerned may be physical assets (e.g. fixed and current assets) or shares in companies. In the former case, the trust is referred to as a dual-purpose or bilateral security trust, and in the latter case as a dual-purpose or bilateral share trust. The trustor holds these assets as security for the funding providers, on condition that under specific circumstances (i.e. regarding the satisfaction of a condition or an event of default, e.g. if the company undergoing restructuring or reorganisation becomes insolvent or agreed covenants are not complied with), either the security interests in physical property or shares are realised in favour of the beneficiary funding providers or – in the case of a share trust – either the management is replaced or an investor process is initiated.
The basis for this is a (security) trust agreement between the trustee and trustor(s) which precisely sets out the rights and obligations of the parties, what the security collateral or trust property comprises, in what circumstances the trustee is entitled to realise the security collateral or trust property, or in what circumstances it is required to initiate or implement operational and corporate actions with respect to the company to be reorganised. Even though the funding providers are not a party to this (security) trust agreement, it is a true contract for the benefit of a third party in accordance with section 328 of the Civil Code (Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, BGB). As beneficiaries under the agreement, the funding providers thus have a direct claim against the trustee for payment of the realisation proceeds of the security collateral or trust property, less costs.